So I at first chalked my having to change my clutch pack out at 6900 miles to a fluke, since I had found other rushmore riders experiencing premature clutch failure as well. Since doing this on Friday though, my friends all seem to have their own theories on how I brought this on myself, and so I'd love to get the thoughts from some of the more experienced riders here, as to whether or not this was my fault...
First and foremost, I definitely don't ride the clutch, so that's not a factor at play here.
Now for the first opinion, the mechanic (indy) who replaced my clutch pack: He showed me my plates and they were all solid black. He said it should have lasted around 50k miles and there should have been no way I could have caused this sort of failure if I tried.
Next opinion, friend #1: Says he notices I short shift a lot and that probably did it. I do tend to short shift, if lets say I'm getting on a freeway and want to quickly get my feet on the highway pegs. As I go up the on-ramp I'll up-shift at 2500 rpms like you would when breaking in the engine, in order to get to 6th faster so I can get my feet on the pegs as soon as I'm on the freeway. Maybe that's not a great habit, but I don't see how that shaves 44,000 miles off the life of the clutch plates.
Friend opinion #2: While talking to a group of friends about this, I mention the only thing I do that I think might adversely effect clutch life, is engine break. I engine break through all gears down to 2nd when I can. For example, if I'm coming up on a light turning yellow a few hundred yards away I get off the throttle, when the engine hits 2k rpm I pull the clutch in, drop down a gear, and blip the throttle just before releasing the clutch lever (to rev match). The engine goes up to about 3k rpm, and when it hits 2k rpm I repeat, until I hit 2nd gear, at which point I slide into neutral and use the brake to complete the stop. This friend says "well that's it!", and claims you should only down shift to 4th gear at most, and just pull the clutch lever, and click down to neutral while braking to a stop.
Again, I don't see how either two practices would cut the life of the clutch so severely. I do ride the bike aggressively, but my line of thinking is along with the mechanic in that even aggressive riding/shifting shouldn't result in a clutch failing at 6900 miles. I would totally buy the theory of my clutch failing at 30k instead of 50k because of me downshifting, but this just seems a bit much. Alas, I refer to your experience and opinions on the matter. Does short shifting drastically shave 10's of thousands of miles off of clutch life? Does engine breaking?
First and foremost, I definitely don't ride the clutch, so that's not a factor at play here.
Now for the first opinion, the mechanic (indy) who replaced my clutch pack: He showed me my plates and they were all solid black. He said it should have lasted around 50k miles and there should have been no way I could have caused this sort of failure if I tried.
Next opinion, friend #1: Says he notices I short shift a lot and that probably did it. I do tend to short shift, if lets say I'm getting on a freeway and want to quickly get my feet on the highway pegs. As I go up the on-ramp I'll up-shift at 2500 rpms like you would when breaking in the engine, in order to get to 6th faster so I can get my feet on the pegs as soon as I'm on the freeway. Maybe that's not a great habit, but I don't see how that shaves 44,000 miles off the life of the clutch plates.
Friend opinion #2: While talking to a group of friends about this, I mention the only thing I do that I think might adversely effect clutch life, is engine break. I engine break through all gears down to 2nd when I can. For example, if I'm coming up on a light turning yellow a few hundred yards away I get off the throttle, when the engine hits 2k rpm I pull the clutch in, drop down a gear, and blip the throttle just before releasing the clutch lever (to rev match). The engine goes up to about 3k rpm, and when it hits 2k rpm I repeat, until I hit 2nd gear, at which point I slide into neutral and use the brake to complete the stop. This friend says "well that's it!", and claims you should only down shift to 4th gear at most, and just pull the clutch lever, and click down to neutral while braking to a stop.
Again, I don't see how either two practices would cut the life of the clutch so severely. I do ride the bike aggressively, but my line of thinking is along with the mechanic in that even aggressive riding/shifting shouldn't result in a clutch failing at 6900 miles. I would totally buy the theory of my clutch failing at 30k instead of 50k because of me downshifting, but this just seems a bit much. Alas, I refer to your experience and opinions on the matter. Does short shifting drastically shave 10's of thousands of miles off of clutch life? Does engine breaking?
Last edited: